Turning business continuity plans into an operating capability for utilities and other essential public services.
Most public utilities and essential-service agencies already own the parts of a business continuity program: an emergency operations plan, IT disaster recovery, perhaps a continuity software license. Few have put those parts together into a capability that would hold up on a bad day.
Water, wastewater and power organizations are good at emergency response. They drill, they use the Incident Command System, and they know how to restore a main or a pump station. The weak point sits behind the response, in the business functions that keep the organization running for days or weeks after the first operational period: payroll, procurement, chemical and parts supply, customer communications, billing, regulatory reporting, and the people who know how all of it works.
This paper draws on Teleion's business continuity engagements with health systems, a global technology company, a large mission-driven enterprise and a public water agency. Across these sectors the same pattern appears. Continuity is often bought, not built: a plan, tool or policy is acquired, but nobody is resourced to make it operate. The fix is rarely another document. It is a phased program, grounded in recognized standards, that moves the organization from ad hoc response to a managed, tested capability.
Key takeaways
Essential public services have little room for a partial outage. A retailer that loses a distribution center can reroute orders. A water utility that loses pressure triggers boil-water notices, hospital contingency plans and school closures. Recent events show how quickly a local failure becomes a community crisis, and how often the failure begins outside the core operating system.
Three recent lessons
None of these began as a cyber event, and none was solved by response skill alone. Each tested the business functions behind operations: supplier management, staffing, communications, finance and coordination with outside agencies. That is the territory of business continuity.
Workforce risk raises the stakes. Brookings estimates that nearly 1.7 million people work directly in U.S. water, and that several water occupations, including treatment operators, skew significantly older than the national workforce. [4] When experienced people retire, undocumented knowledge leaves with them. A continuity program is one of the few disciplines that systematically captures how critical work actually gets done.
In our engagements we rarely find an organization with nothing. We find organizations with pieces: a plan written for an audit, an IT recovery runbook, a software license, a binder in the emergency operations center. What is missing is the operating model that makes those pieces work together and keeps them current.
Five symptoms we see repeatedly
A continuity program that exists only as a purchase is not a capability. The question is what each function would do on day one, day three and day thirty.
The situation. The organization had purchased a capable continuity platform but never put it into use. Plans covered IT but not the rest of the enterprise, recovery objectives were not consistently defined, and there was no exercise program or cross-functional plan for a ransomware event. A single newly hired continuity manager owned the whole program.
What Teleion did. Teleion placed a CBCP-credentialed practitioner as the program’s execution arm so the manager could focus on strategy and stakeholders. The work ran in three layers: platform (assessment, configuration and access framework, templates, training, automated reporting and a program health dashboard); content (BIAs, recovery plans and playbooks developed with each department, recovery objectives reconciled with IT, and a cross-functional ransomware playbook as one of several hazard scenarios); and program management (tabletop exercises, after-action reports, steering committee reporting and a maturity assessment).
The result. The platform is now an operating capability with a populated repository and live coverage reporting. At the client’s request Teleion also built an enterprise-wide recovery framework, which was not in the original scope, to tie departmental plans together. The engagement has been renewed twice, and the client’s program lead rated Teleion a 10 on Net Promoter Score.
Utilities often assume that a strong emergency management function means they are covered. The two disciplines are related but answer different questions. Emergency management protects people, property and the environment in the first hours of an incident. Business continuity keeps the organization's critical functions running through and after the disruption, often for weeks. IT disaster recovery restores the technology both depend on.
Exhibit 1. Three related disciplines, three different questions
| Aspect | Emergency Management | Business Continuity | IT Disaster Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core question | How do we protect life, property and the environment now? | How do critical functions keep running until normal operations resume? | How fast can we restore systems and data? |
| Time horizon | Before, during and immediately after an incident | During the disruption and through long-term recovery | From system failure to restoration |
| Typical owner | Emergency manager, safety, operations | Continuity manager with business-unit leaders | IT infrastructure and applications |
| Key artifacts | Emergency response plan, ICS roles, EOC procedures | BIA, recovery strategies, business continuity plans, exercises | DR plans, backups, recovery runbooks |
| Utility example | Main break response, evacuation, boil-water notice | Paying staff, buying chemicals, billing customers and reporting to regulators during a long outage | Restoring the customer information or work-order system |
Source: Teleion analysis, adapted from engagement work and DRII Professional Practices. [5]
Where NIMS fits
Most utilities already know the National Incident Management System. Since its release in 2004, NIMS has given responders a shared language, systems and processes, including the Incident Command System, Emergency Operations Center structures and Multiagency Coordination Groups, and it applies to the private sector and non-governmental organizations as well as government. [6] FEMA’s Continuity Guidance Circular states the connection directly: organizations should integrate continuity planning with incident management planning and operations. [7]
In practice that means the EOC should be able to answer continuity questions as well as response questions. Which business functions are degraded? Which recovery objectives are at risk? Which suppliers, staff or systems need to be redirected? A continuity program supplies those answers in advance through the business impact analysis and recovery plans, so the incident commander is not improvising them.
The situation. A large public water agency is implementing an Emergency Operations Center to coordinate its response to incidents affecting water delivery.
What Teleion is doing. Teleion is supporting the EOC implementation. The engagement treats the EOC as the point where incident command and business continuity meet: response roles aligned to ICS, and a structure that can call on continuity information about critical functions, dependencies and recovery priorities.
Why it matters. An EOC that knows only about the incident manages the first operational period well. An EOC connected to the continuity program can also manage day three and day thirty.
A credible program needs a recognized framework so that leadership, auditors and partner agencies can see what good looks like. Teleion aligns its work to the Disaster Recovery Institute International (DRII) Ten Professional Practices for business continuity management [5] and to ISO 22301, the international standard for business continuity management systems. [8] The practices give a complete map of the program; the standard gives a management-system discipline of policy, objectives, review and continual improvement.
We use the ten practices as a diagnostic. Exhibit 2 shows a gap profile typical of organizations that have strong emergency response but no formal continuity program. It is drawn from a Teleion assessment of a large regional health system, and the pattern closely matches what we see at utilities.
Exhibit 2. Typical gap profile against the DRII Ten Professional Practices
| Professional Practice | Gap | Typical finding |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Program Management | High | No formal program, charter or executive sponsor |
| 2. Risk Assessment | Medium | Strong focus on IT risk; limited view of operational risk |
| 3. Business Impact Analysis | High | BIAs incomplete across critical functions |
| 4. Business Continuity Strategies | Medium | Some strategies exist but are not optimized |
| 5. Incident Preparedness and Response | Medium | Basic incident management that needs enhancement |
| 6. Plan Development and Implementation | Medium | Plans exist but are not integrated or standardized |
| 7. Awareness and Training | High | No formal continuity training or awareness |
| 8. Exercise, Assessment and Maintenance | High | Isolated tests; no enterprise exercise program |
| 9. Crisis Communications | Low | Emergency protocols within a unified escalation framework |
| 10. Coordination with External Agencies | Low | Established relationships with emergency services |
Source: Teleion gap assessment of a large regional health system, against DRII Professional Practices. [5]
The pattern is worth noticing. The practices closest to emergency management (crisis communications and external coordination) score well. The practices that make continuity a managed program (governance, BIA, training and exercising) score poorly. Utilities with mature emergency response should expect a similar profile.
Continuity maturity is built in sequence. Trying to run full-scale exercises before business impact analyses exist, or buying a tool before there is anyone to run it, is how programs end up bought rather than built. Teleion uses a five-level maturity model and a three-phase roadmap that most organizations can complete in about three years.
Exhibit 3. Business continuity maturity levels
| Level | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Basic | Ad hoc response; plans live in people's heads |
| Level 2 | Developing | Plans exist but are not integrated (typical starting point) |
| Level 3 | Defined | Documented, standard processes |
| Level 4 | Managed | Integrated program, tested regularly (three-year target) |
| Level 5 | Optimized | Continuous improvement |
Source: Teleion maturity model.
Exhibit 4. Crawl-walk-run roadmap by workstream
| Workstream | Crawl (Year 1): Foundation and structure | Walk (Year 2): Process and documentation | Run (Year 3): Maturity and simulation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | Executive sponsor; charter and policy approved; steering committee formed | Plan review and approval cycle | Performance review; culture assessment |
| Program management | Team formed; resources allocated | Implementation; change management | Optimization; continuous improvement |
| Risk and impact | Initial risk review; BIAs for critical functions | Risk validation; recovery objectives reconciled with IT | Ongoing assessment; external audit readiness |
| Plans | Recovery strategies selected | Plans documented and integrated under an enterprise recovery framework | Refinement; alignment with ISO 22301 |
| Training and exercises | Team training; awareness launched | Tabletop exercises with after-action reports | Functional and full-scale exercises with partner agencies |
| Technology | Assess existing tools; configure or select platform | Templates, reporting and notification integrated | Automation; program health dashboard |
Source: Teleion roadmap developed for a large regional health system, generalized.
Sizing the team
The most common reason programs stall is staffing. In a recent assessment of a regional health system with more than ten thousand staff, Teleion found two fractional team members supporting continuity. Using a planning ratio of roughly one continuity professional per 1,000 employees, we recommended a dedicated team of six: a director, program managers aligned to major business areas, and an executive sponsor. Smaller utilities will need fewer people, but the principle holds: a program needs named owners with time to do the work.
Not every agency can hire a full team at once. In those cases we recommend the model that has worked for our clients: a client-owned continuity lead who sets strategy and owns relationships, supported by a credentialed practitioner who carries execution. That keeps decision rights inside the organization while giving it the capacity to move through the roadmap.
Beyond the examples above, three further engagements shaped how we approach continuity for organizations with essential missions.
The situation. A health network spanning more than a dozen hospitals needed a single continuity framework across facilities that had each planned on their own.
What Teleion did. Established the enterprise continuity framework, led continuity tool selection, and conducted risk assessments and business impact analyses across the network.
Lesson for utilities. Distributed operations (treatment plants, pumping stations, field crews) need one framework with local plans beneath it, not a separate approach at each site.
The situation. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the company's real estate and facilities operations had to keep buildings open and vendors working while public health rules changed weekly.
What Teleion did. Identified critical functions and set up a daily inventory process for protective supplies, with monthly consumption forecasts, redundant vendors and stock rotation. Produced the missing step-by-step remote-access instructions so vendor staff could work securely off site. Found that about 80% of the staff running a key workflow platform were in one metro area, and established backups in another region. Separately, Teleion supported supply-chain risk analysis and continuity compliance for a cloud infrastructure group.
Lesson for utilities. Single points of failure hide in people, places and suppliers as much as in systems. The chlorine shortage of 2021 is the same problem in a different form.
The situation. The organization had strong emergency management and a partial BIA, but no formal continuity program, limited staffing and little enterprise exercising.
What Teleion did. Assessed existing documentation and supply-chain readiness, ran a gap analysis against the ten practices, identified 18 critical functions for business impact analysis, and delivered staffing, technology and roadmap recommendations to leadership.
Lesson for utilities. A short, standards-based assessment gives leadership a clear picture of current state, target state and the cost of getting there, which is what it takes to win sponsorship and funding.
These ten questions, one per professional practice, give a quick read on where your organization stands. If you answer no or not sure to more than three, your program is probably at Level 1 or 2.
A fixed-scope assessment of your current program against the DRII Ten Professional Practices. You receive a gap analysis, a maturity rating with a target state, staffing and technology recommendations, and a crawl-walk-run roadmap your leadership can fund.
For more information about how Teleion can help build your business continuity program, please visit Security, Risk and Compliance.